Wednesday, January 20, 2010
Retard In Disguise

At the workplace, it is inescapable that we make small talk in order to not risk being portrayed as standoffish. This is acceptable, and in fact beneficial, as long as the tete-a-tete does not hinder your efficacy.
And so, our story begins.
This bold declaration above came about while I was toiling through my work and my colleague practically quite did nothing at all. He was absolved of blame as he had a physical defect in his wrist. Or so he said. Working at a factory could be somewhat repetitive. To break the tedium, we engaged in some mindless chit-chat across a panoply of topics. We talked about ourselves, e.g. where we live, which school are we from, which CCAs do we participate in, etcetera. This colleague of mine was singularly reticent about his school and where he stayed and so I had to change the topic to further our conversation.
As I had heard from him that he had taken leave to accompany his grandmother to the doctor and conveniently catch a movie with his friends, I decided to broach the subject on movies. The movie he had watched was Avatar (pronounced as air-vuh-tahr, not ah-vah-tahr), which had been receiving much hype. Being the curious me, I sought his opinion on the movie. I had expected him to lavish praise on James Cameron's gargantuan production. To my surprise, he begged to differ from the perspective of the masses. He was critical towards the movie, claiming that it was "stupid" and "difficult to understand". These two remarks seemed to me as contradictory and thus, left me confounded. In a bid to know more about the movie, I asked him his reasons for the negative comments. He stuttered at first but thought of a reasonably sound explanation after awhile. His reason for labelling Avatar as "stupid" was the omission of an exciting action sequence. According to him, the protagonist, Jake Sully, mananged to tame the strongest creature in the blue aliens' world. This was deemed impossible as no one had done it before. Unfortunately, such a momentous fighting scene between the creature and Jake Sully was cut out. How he knew which scenes were censored is still a mystery to me. Anyway, that was why my colleague called the movie "stupid". Then, Avatar was "difficult to understand" because it contained a "fuck scene" (those were his exact words) between Jake Sully and Neytiri. As a result, primary school students, who apparently lack carnal knowledge, would find it "difficult to understand". Noting his discerning eye for movies, I asked him the movies which he would recommend to me. Being the critic that he was, he was quick to recognise that there was no such thing as a perfect movie. I had to acquiese with him on this point. Perfection is decidedly unachievable. So, I proceeded to ask him which movie he had watched was the closest to attainng perfection.
And here came the punch line.
"Transformers is the almost perfect movie," he said with a professorial air and a glint in his eyes. I maintained my stolid countenance. He carried on professing his admiration for Trasformers without my prompting this time. All the while, he complimented Transformers for its suspenseful plot, frenetic action sequences and classy acting.
I have not seen Transformers myself and hence, it would be awfully insular to discount its merits on my part. Having said that, I am convinced that Transformers is by no means a flawless artwork.
And here is the crux of the issue. Teenagers, nowadays, often fail to appreciate a genuinely praiseworthy movie. All they care about are SFX, CGI and BDSM. I am no movie aficionado. I am clueless about artistic direction. When it comes to acting, I am a worse judge than Ellen Degeneres is in American Idol. But at the very least, I am able to identify movies such as American Beauty as a movie with a message. Didn't we learn in Social Studies that by picking out the message or purpose of a source, it indicates a higher level of thinking? Then why can't we do the same for movies? I fancy watching slapstick movies (e.g. Scary Movie, Zombieland) as well to get a good laugh and train my abs. But the distinction is here. I perceive such movies as simple pure fun and do not expect them to aim anywhere near moral or intellectual high ground. And that is what I am driving at. To be cognizant of the fact that Scary Movie can only make your sides hurt and Transformers is nothing but artificial action entertainment. They offer no sophistication at all.
The worst part of all these is people pay to watch these movies while those really deserving ones are, more often than not, box-office debacles.
I am still a greenhorn but still has my fair share of watching movies. If anyone wants any advice, I highly recommend American Beauty. That is my favourite movie so far. To get an idea of what is good acting, take note of Lester Burnham's visage when he dies. Genius.
And please. Don't ever say Transformers is the almost perfect movie. Don't be the ignominy of human cognition.
11:00 PM
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Paedophobia
I was struck with a malady. I am not aware of the ubiquity of this disease. It is neither incurable nor excruciating. Nonetheless, I would prefer to live without it. The disease I was afflicted with was paedophobia.
I was seriously concerned with this particular affliction because it seemed like I was the only one to be bothered by paedophobia. I made up this disease. Whether it exists or not, I do not know. Since I made it up, I should be able to tell you what it is.
Paedophobia, as its name suggests, is the fear of children. In my case, it was very mild. I would neither go berserk nor shun them when I met children. However, I had a proclivity to avoid contact with children. The rationale was unclear even to myself. I did not know if I was afraid of hurting them or I just lacked the love for children. Whenever I saw people cajoling children so effortlessly and yet I could not do it, I always tell myself it was because they had taken care of a child before. Of course, it was a poor excuse.
Initially, I thought nothing of it. It was no big deal to me. However, as time went by, I became increasingly bothered by it. Get-togethers with relatives were quite frequent and usually toddlers and small children would be around. Being introverted by nature (and this is substantiated by the DISC Test and Myer-Briggs Test), I naturally feel awkward in such occasions. Furthermore, I could not horse around with children due to my ailment. Therefore, I was somewhat like the proverbial sore thumb. And as more time went by, people began to ask questions. 'Why am I so quiet?' or 'Why do I talk so little?', they would ask. This was an especially pressing issue as my sister was an absolute contrast to me. She was helpful, gregarious and most of all, good with kids. This was despite the fact that she had never taken care of children before. I knew everyone perceived me as some kind of weirdo. That feeling was dreadful and yet I felt I could do nothing about it. Probably, I was being apathetic.
All these changed on a fateful trip to Malaysia last December. I did not know why but I always either learned an important lesson or was touched by a poignant moment whenever I visited in Malaysia.
I went there, as usual, to visit my Malaysian relatives, primely my grandmother who was getting on in years. This time I went to Taiping, Sepatang, which was a quaint coastal village. From what I know, the place was the main exporter of charcoal and cockles in Malaysia. The pace of life at Sepatang was very slow. The village did not have high-tech entertainment like we had in the cities. Computers, handphones, gaming consoles were a rarity.
During the stay, my Second Aunt had arranged my mother and I to reside in her abode. When I stepped into her house, lo and behold, there were two children, who were both my nephew and niece. I felt the sky crashing down on me. I had no qualms living in a slightly backward village. However, throw in two children and it became mission impossible. As I had said earlier, there was nothing much to do bar watching the television. Consequently, clowning with the kids became the main preoccupation. As my mother could not be around me all the time, I was left defenceless against the menacing tykes.
At my wit's end, I decided to grasp the nettle. I was not going to run away from the problem. Instead, I was going to face it head on. I plucked up courage and opened up. A path of uncertainty laid ahead of me but I remained undaunted. Fight, I would, 'til the very end.
I was apprehensive but did not want to appear incompetent in front of my relatives. Moreover, my nephew was like a soft toy in flesh. His reactions were totally unpredictable, which were both good and bad because he brought so much amusement to me; on the other hand, he was difficult to look after.
After seven days of 'rigorous' training, I came out of Malaysia a new man. It was a deeply rewarding expereince for me. I strided across Woodlands Checkpoint and was greeted with a refreshing breeze . I felt a new lease of life breathed into me as the breeze coursed through my nostrils and enriched my lungs with that oh-so-good oxygen. I stood rooted and closed my eyes for a second to fully comprehend this momentous freedom. I could now receive children with arms wide open.
I was cured.
6:04 PM
Thursday, January 7, 2010
Dearth of Mirth
Quite some time ago, I watched a documentary entitled 'The History of Joke'. It was basically a documentary on how humour has evolved since the dawn of civilisation. From the jesters of medieval ages to the stand-up comedians we have today, the art of comedy has come quite a long way indeed.
Despite the ways humour has morphed and transformed, the one end in mind is almost always invariable. Its aim is to make you laugh. Laughter, however, is only the reaction. To put it in another way, laughter is a manifestation of an emotion. Happiness or euphoria happens to be this emotion. Your id builds up happiness through responding to a series of scenarios that stimulate the brain's emotive section. When happiness reaches its climax, it is released as laughter. Of course, laughter in true effect does not work so methodically. It is very spontaneous and instantaneous. As such, you do not notice the processes that trigger laughter.
Putting the neuroscience aside, laughter, as we know it, is something pleasurable. As a result, we are inclined towards the experience of humour. As paraphrased from 'The History of Joke', laughter is something you express when you are unable to put into words the feelings you feel. Very much like crying. When the sadness becomes unbearable or indescribable, you tear.
Going into the technicalities of laughter itself seem highly unreliable for I personally am bereft of the necessary expertise. What I am looking to discuss is humour. Probing into the cause rather than the effect.
Having said all that, I must clarify that humour is decidedly subjective. As an inexperienced being on Earth, I dare not exclaim what is considered humour definitively.
So let us begin.
First and foremost, what is funny depends very much on the circumstance and the atmosphere. That is why people do not crack up during a funeral because that means disrespect. Even if some dullard springs out and ejaculates 'I'm Indian and I'm gay!', you are supposed to stifle your laughter. Hang on. No. That thought should not even cross your mind. You may be thinking, 'Who the hell knows?' But, it is the thought that counts, if you know what I mean. I am being exaggerated over here, but you and I know that once in a blue moon some freak accident is going to happen and tickle your funny bone at the most inopportune moment. Then you have to bite the bullet and start hacking at your own neck to prevent your vocal chords from producing nary a snigger.
Jigsaw fashion.
Hence, as a matter of fact, laughter has become a sort of moral volition instead of an instinctive behaviour. Maybe 'moral volition' sounds a tad too severe. However, one cannot deny that humour has metastasised into a complex issue. It is no longer a matter of 'funny' or 'boring'. There are too many considerations and consequneces at stake. I say these possibly because I have not worked in the society and thus, I may not comprehend the profound impact of social etiquette and behaviour yet.
Regardless of those, I believe that people still lack a 'primitive' side, so to speak. They are too uptight. They are constantly in distress, worrying over how they appear to others or whether they are offending someone. They cannot allow themselves to just let out a burst of laughter, right from the heart and soul. They become devoid of joy. They laugh because they want to conform. They laugh because it is a form of geniality. They laugh because it is right. They laugh because it is wrong. They laugh because they do not know if it is right or wrong. Actually, there is no right or wrong. It is not a sin to laugh. Just laugh. The only condition is to laugh genuinely. Laugh heartily. No longer is there a need to laugh at a joke to reward a person for his effort. If it is not funny, do not laugh. If you have the guts, tell him so. Stop laughing at anything and everything, unless you really mean it.
This is not about socialising. If you think so, you already missed the point. This is about being you. Stop sporting a mask like everyone else. Make yourself detest the peals of faux laughter. Only then will you nurture authentic interaction and communication.
And do not worry about laughing at someone's misfortune or plight. When you are able to laugh genuinely, you will not commit such evils. That is because you have shed the facade. You display extraodinary gumption in being willing to unfurl yourself. That, in itself, is meritorious. By filling your laughter with heart and veracity, you have attained that intimacy with your true self. Therefore, how will one, who envelopes the purity of the soul, bow down to such rotten behaviour?
Alas, I sincerely exhort you to laugh by your own free will. Curb the epidemic of faux laughter before it is too late. There is a dearth of mirth right now. Do not let it turn into the
death of mirth.
1:23 PM